Tuesday, September 29, 2015

NIETZSCHE AND ETERNAL RETURN IN GROUNDHOG DAY


   Is Groundhog Day one of the great philosophical movies? Seen in the most trivial level it is just another Hollywood movie, but on closer inspection, it provides a stunning treatment of Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence.
   In this movie, a weatherman relives the same day repeatedly without hope to scape of this situation. The story illustrates Nietzsche’s theory of eternal return and it shows how we perceive the importance of the future. We see in this film how this philosopher was able to offer an alternative to the Christian view of the meaning of life.
   Christianity has a linear interpretation of time. It is the future that gives value to the present, in others words, the future is when we will be in heaven. However, for Nietzsche, this aspect of the religion is life-denying, so it corrupts our view of our time here. His alternative is reject the linear conception of time. Rather than moving on to another place after life, we would relive our life over and over again. This possibility has been called eternal return. The eternal return is the idea of Nietzsche that we have experienced the exact life we are now living an infinite number of times in the past, and will do it an infinite number of times in the future.


   Instead of The Christian linear concept of time, where there is an emphasis on the future, Nietzsche’s theory maybe tells us to consider a different alternative. Nietzsche though people would be depressed because there was no God or no life after death. The problem is these beliefs provides comfort and help people preserve in defaults moments. This is why the passage introducing the though about eternal return is named “The Greatest Weight”, in other words, the knowledge that is nothing better than this life could be a weight upon our minds.
   The challenge offered by the theory of eternal return can be the question: “What if this life is all we have? Are you strong to be free and choose to life according to a model that is fitting for you, where there are no God or Heaven? Phil, the weatherman in this movie, faced a similar situation.
   In Groundhog Day, Phil Connors believes that no matter what he does, every day he wakes up at the same time, in the same bed, in the same hotel, in the same small American town, on the same day. During the day, he is free to do what he wants, but he knows he is doomed to start the same day again. Even when he wants to die, he cannot.
   Therefore, the film presents the story of a man who must face the prospect of not having any future. He must relive the same day among the people he disdains in a place he does not like. It is also the story of a man  who comes to appreciate and love his life as it is rather than dreamming of a better future, while he hates the present.
  However, Groundhog Day, can contradict the Nietzsche’s theory. In the film, there is no Nietzschean return of the same as soon as the main character is able to act differently every day and make different events happen. Groundhog Day presents a more human version of the eternal return.
   Some philosophers agree that the conventional view of Nietzsche's eternal return refers to the return of the same, but objects to this view, claiming that it is a sterile thought, which excludes any notion of "the other". Recurrence is entirely self-referential. We can think of it as a kind of 'self-birth': it provides men with the ability to give birth to themselves repeatedly.
   In the theory of eternal recurrence of Nietzsche, the individual has no memory of their previous lives. However, Phil Connors certainly has, although he was the only one. All others with whom he shares his eternal return is perhaps the classic Nietzschean position of having no memory of their past lives. Phil is not dealing with the eternal return as a hypothesis, he is a conscious participant and his victim, totally out of your control.
   The eternal return Nietzsche is perhaps logically problematic because if an individual's life is a repeat of previous lives then he would appear to have no free choice, yet Nietzsche seems to want us to alter our attitude to life. Phil can change, so he has complete free choice. It is up to him to choose his attitude to his metaphysical and existential situation. First, he experiences complete shock, before enjoying a brief feeling of omnipotence and omniscience. Then he suffers depression but he is unable to die. He has some choices within the limits of Punxatawney.
   After much pressure, Phil chooses to do most of the world he inhabits now. He educates himself in many new fields. He also develops as a person and achieves self-awareness, rather than the self-destruction he pursued previously. Through this enlightenment, he finally secures the love of the woman he has pursued. He become a monument of self-improvement Nietzsche. This is so important that, in fact, Phil escape from the eternal return, but now he is a human being transformed, reborn out of the difficulties he has faced.

   This is maybe the key to the eternal return: it is not to be taken literally, but as an aphorism to guide people to whom Nihilism was becoming an increasingly attractive prospect when Nietzsche wrote about it.  The film’s situation is not exactly eternal return, because Phil relives one day rather than an entire lifetime and more importantly, he learns from his experience and alters his behavior. Nevertheless, since eternal return is not a metaphysical thesis, these differences are of little importance. Phil is directly confronted with the possibility that he has no more future, that he must relive an ordinary day over and over again, and this is way Groundhog Day helps us to illuminate Nietzsche’s theory. When the eternal return begins, the main character feels his “greatest weight” because he must relive the same day witch he hates.
   The moral choice we must regarding how we will see our situation should express strength. It is an opportunity to choose a challenge for us. All the pain of this life offers us worthy challenge and an opportunity to improve ourselves according to our own ideal. To embrace eternal return is to embrace life. Nietzsche draws attention to the fact that the way we conceive of life and its meaning affects the way we live. We should not look outside of ourselves for meaning.
   Embracing eternal return involves a self-affirmation. Nietzsche alternative to Christianity involves "self-expression without metaphysical justification." Groundhog Day is a masterpiece of existentialism. The film’s lesson is that we can escape from any dilemma that through the right attitude. As Connors discovers, it is a hard lesson, but to learn is to earn the means to transcend the problems of life.

3 comments:

  1. Nice analysis!

    The greatest weight for Nietzsche is this eternal return to the same but actually you point the great distinction between the two interpretation of the phenomenon : the knowing of what happened.
    According to Nietzsche, we're not supposed to recognize that we are starting all over again, the only fear is enough to make us understand the concept. But actually Phil Connors knows that he made it already, lives the same day and can change it. In GroundHog Day, the fate doesn't exist for him (for him only but that's already a big difference). He can change what depends on him, his behavior toward the facts.

    So he can experience what depends on him really in the world and in his life! It is an awesome tool to find his real place in the world.
    And he challenges himself a lot of time : if he can steal money, if he can eat everything, if he can seduce a woman in less than 24h, if he can die.
    Finally we join once again Nietzsche's nihilism : at first, he rejects his traditional life, because he is soon bored (or something like that) ; then he's got a rage against the fact that everything begin all over again (figure of the lion) when for example he punches an old friend, Ned ; and this absence of rules, of consequences for him pushes him to try to die, just to experience something else (hit by a car, throw himself out of the deck, etc.) ; and finally he build new values for himself, care about people and help them because he knows.

    He knows. That's really the key fact in this : he can predict the future, do whatever he wants, can't die. That's the definition of a god. And he tells Rita : "I'm a god". Not The God but A god. And that's right, the difference between a temporal human and an in temporal god disappeared.

    And in the end, that's when he's finally him, the nice and honest him (because we're in an Hollywood movie) that he can continues his life and receive the relief of living the moment just once and eventually die.
    This end is different from what Nietzsche theorize but a film must find an end. I find it disappointing that they choose the relief for the main character though : do we really want to be human after all?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Max,

    Thanks for the compliment and forgiveness for the late reply.

    I think your comment helped explain many issues that I have pointed in this text. The moments of the movie that you have mentioned also made me reflect about the subject.

    There have been several times when I have thought the film might not really represent the Nietzsche’s theory. The end of the movie is different as many other parts of Groundhog Day, but I think it helps a lot to understand certain concepts of this theory.

    However, I was wondering now if Amor Fati is why Phil lives the same day over and over again, until he learns to accept his fate. And when Amor Fati occurs, Phil realizes that the loop time is broken. So, the end maybe have some relations with Nietzsche’s theory?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right Amanda!

      Actually yes, the film is really different from the Nietzsche's theory but we must remember that this film wasn't built on a representation of a theory. This is a movie based on a scenario meant to be produced and viewed. And I don't think that saying "I want to mean a movie about this theory of Nietzsche" is really a way to convince people.
      It's not sexy enough. The film has to be comic, introduce a story that needs to end, entertain! Nietzsche hadn't this problem because he was writing a book, not to entertain readers but to share a though.
      In this view, I actually find it is a great movie because he managed to evoke a lot of Nietzsche's themes!

      I didn't think of it at first but now that you're writing it, Amor Fati is really in there. Not in the way that Nietzsche explains about tragedy, but in the way feel is not waiting for anything to happen after his "last day again", he has a relief in advance.

      I'm sure Nietzsche was an inspiration but we probably found more relationships between the two after studying Nietzsche...

      Delete