Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Sarah Goldfarb's Despair : From the Ab-surd life to the loss of herself


Sarah Goldfarb is the perfect illustration of the hidden despair, the person who doesn’t know that she is despaired: her fall into drug addiction is not the beginning of her despair it is just the logic result of her long time denying of despair.


Sarah’s failure to become her TV Show self: possibility’s despair which led to the loss of herself

Kierkegaard says that the self is the relation relating itself to itself but the fact is the self doesn’t know what itself is.  So, the person just supposes what he is and tries to relate to it. The situation of a person who doesn’t manage to become the self he wanted to be is a case of despair. This is what happens to Sarah.  Sarah’s self has changed, herself is alone, it is not anymore a self with her husband and her son. Moreover her body has changed so the relation between her body and her soul that tries to relate to herself has changed to.  The possibility of her participation of a TV show makes her realize the change.  So, she can’t stand this change anymore and wants to be a self that she is not, her twenty years ago self. Imagine herself in the TV makes her feel like herself but she feel like herself in a way that is not herself: because she has never pay attention to herself. She tries to destroy her actual self by beginning a drug diet. She thinks that with a weight lose she will be able to destroy herself to become the new self she wants to be.  But her destruction of her body and her mind doesn’t enable her to destroy herself and to become the power that established the relation that relates herself to herself. The scenes that best depicts her inevitable failure is when she imagines her wanted self into the TV show and the wanted self goes out the TV to make fun of Sarah’s apartment and then of Sarah herself. (For those who are strong enough or psychopath enough to want to watch the scene again, there is the link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR6PiX367WA). Then everybody inside the TV show makes fun of her and Sarah tries to justify why she didn’t become her wanted self: the beautiful, charismatic and interesting woman on the TV. She says “Could you do better?”; “I am old” she starts being aware of her incapacity to change herself. But she has already lost herself into the possibility, she has followed her desire to be someone else and she is not able anymore to find the way to return to herself. She, at the end, doesn’t realize her dream but persist to live in the illusion.


Sarah’s Ab-surd life


The interesting fact is that she didn’t start being desperate when she fails to change herself. She was already under another kind of despair before she starts to want to change herself, before she sees herself into the mirror and doesn’t manage to put her red dress. Indeed, she lives an AB-SURD life from the first minute of the movie. Her son when he tries to find a gift for her says that her “fix” is television. She loses herself into distractions. But that is a kind of unconscious lack of infinitude despair: When her son and her husband were there she thought that she was the self that look after them, she existed for them but when they are gone she tried to forget her existence, she thinks she is nobody. She doesn’t pay attention to herself; she pays attention to how the persons see herself. Herself doesn’t become itself but it let itself being “tricked out by the other”. That is why as long as nobody is able to see her she doesn’t mind about herself, she doesn’t look at her reflect in the mirror. To relate to Kierkegaard theory it is not just that she doesn’t know what herself is, it’s that she doesn’t seek for herself so she is not able to know that she is a spirit in front of god. She never had an insight into her existence: that is why she thinks that the point of existing is to exist for the other; that is why she falls even more into despair when she has to confront herself. 

6 comments:

  1. Hi :) Do you think she could return to being "herself"?
    Can one create "oneself" when there no "one" to begin with? When someone has been living for other purposes, for other's purposes?
    Great summary btw :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Estelle Chan I actually don't think that she can return to herself because she doesn't only losed herself, she also losed her mind because of drugs. Moreover the ending scene shows that she stayed in her illusions, she still dream of her TV Show self.
      To answer your second question i would say that the fact that she has been living for other purpose doesn't mean that she is no "one, that she has no self but just that she didn't seem to be aware of that. I don't find any situation where there is no one to begin with because we don't chose to be "one". if we could create ourself with nothing at the begining it means that we choose to exist and we don't. (tell me if my answer is not clear)

      Delete
  2. Hey
    First let's say how amazing is this actress.
    Then, about the character of Sarah : I think her biggest problem is the evolution of her subjecting truth as Kierkegaard talks about it. She had one specific relation to her surd that was overwhelmed by her son's leaving, relation that is precisely her self, that made who she is, and that was to dedicate herself to her husband and her son, like you said. Actually, she has, until then, avoided existence by hiding behind her role in her family. When her son leaves, she's a lost soul looking for marks, and she has to find a new reason to wake up every morning, like she explains it herself.
    I don't think that this is about despair ; Sarah is actually a pretty optimistic woman : she keeps hoping that someday, she'd be called to go on TV. Call it madness or illusion, I call it fighting for living, and that's the most terrible in it.
    Then, why is this fight being lost? Well, because Sarah's not armed enough to face reality. Indeed, her hopes are not related to something pragmatic, and this, Sarah can feel. The scene you evoked, where she keeps repeating "I'm old", reveals she's not totally cutten from reality, but that she just didn't manage to find another way to live than to convince herself that everything is still possible, even though she's old. Sarah deals really badly with her old age and her solitude. In fact, she deals badly with life. It's mostly about being strong and knowing how to face life and all what is sometimes not very pleasant in it. So I'd say that Sarah is more "weak" than desperate : to me, she doesn't realize how much her situation is hopeless. And drugs are really shown here as the refuge of those who need help for living, but obviously, this help is just another illusion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think Despair, as Kierkegaard defines it,is a matter of being optimistic or pessimistic. I think it is a matter of how you cope with yourself. the fight of Sarah to become what she wants, her hope to be called to go to TV is the reflection of her unsatisfaction of her actual self. Since she doesn't like herself she wants to become another woman thanks to the television. but to pursue a self that yout know is only and ever going to be a dream is a kind of despair. I agree that this dream keeps her alive and at the same time keeps her away from suffering and despondency. But to me despair is not about suffering and not about not being able to keep on living : it is about not being able to keep on living with your actual self.

      Delete
    2. PS : She indeed is a wonderful actress. I haven't still recover from the scene when everybody is laughing at her...

      Delete
  3. Hi Eva, great post !

    I just would like to react on a few things.
    You are talking about Sarah’s despair not being herself anymore, the self she was when she could fit in this lovely red dress. Actually, that is right, we can not divide the mind of our body. Trying to be thinner, Sarah thinks that people will love her more and that she will reach the happiness she felt during the best days of her life. But the body is not what we are. In The Metamorphosis of Kafka, when Gregor wakes up as a bug, he still thinking about how to leave the bed and how to go to work. This is not because he is a bug that he is thinking like a bug. But we are just a little mind living in a body that makes us because that is what everyone sees. Thit is when ourselves begins to belong to others.
    You are saying that, at the beginning of the movie, Sarah is despaired of the lost of the one she loved and of being alone, that it is a « hidden despair ». I do not really agree with you. It seems to me that Sarah were pretty happy at first. She had a quiet life, her memories and had cool grandma friends. She did not party with them every night (why not ?) but I found in their relationship a real affection. Sarah turned mad when she began to hope that the whole country will love her through this TV show.
    The truth is that in Huis Clos, Sartre have never been so right saying « The hell, it is the others ». For instance, Sarah’s son and his girlfriend Marianne should be happy together, just because they are together and love each other. But they destroy themselves being far away. In L’Etranger de Camus, the character seems to have less problems not carrying of anybody but the sun and the sound of the waves on the sand.
    I can’t help thinking that we would all be happier without the others. But the fact is that we can not live without the others. That is what is absurd in our lives. Our self is not ourselves. We all are everybody’s slave. Pretty sad.
    To me, drugs in this movie are just a metamorphosis of others : we can not do without them, but they destroy us.

    Well … That was pretty fatalist. Did not want to take away your appetite …

    ReplyDelete