Sarah
Goldfarb is the perfect illustration of the hidden despair, the person who doesn’t
know that she is despaired: her fall into drug addiction is not the beginning
of her despair it is just the logic result of her long time denying of despair.
Sarah’s failure to
become her TV Show self: possibility’s despair which led to the loss of herself
Kierkegaard
says that the self is the relation relating itself to itself but the fact is
the self doesn’t know what itself is.
So, the person just supposes what he is and tries to relate to it. The
situation of a person who doesn’t manage to become the self he wanted to be is
a case of despair. This is what happens to Sarah. Sarah’s self has changed, herself is alone,
it is not anymore a self with her husband and her son. Moreover her body has
changed so the relation between her body and her soul that tries to relate to
herself has changed to. The possibility
of her participation of a TV show makes her realize the change. So, she can’t stand this change anymore and
wants to be a self that she is not, her twenty years ago self. Imagine herself
in the TV makes her feel like herself but she feel like herself in a way that
is not herself: because she has never pay attention to herself. She tries to
destroy her actual self by beginning a drug diet. She thinks that with a weight
lose she will be able to destroy herself to become the new self she wants to
be. But her destruction of her body and
her mind doesn’t enable her to destroy herself and to become the power that
established the relation that relates herself to herself. The scenes that best depicts
her inevitable failure is when she imagines her wanted self into the TV show and
the wanted self goes out the TV to make fun of Sarah’s apartment and then of
Sarah herself. (For those who are strong enough or psychopath enough to want to
watch the scene again, there is the link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR6PiX367WA). Then everybody inside the TV show
makes fun of her and Sarah tries to justify why she didn’t become her wanted
self: the beautiful, charismatic and interesting woman on the TV. She says
“Could you do better?”; “I am old” she starts being aware of her incapacity to
change herself. But she has already lost herself into the possibility, she has followed
her desire to be someone else and she is not able anymore to find the way to
return to herself. She, at the end, doesn’t realize her dream but persist to
live in the illusion.
Sarah’s Ab-surd
life
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f8eb/6f8eb5046a7edddcaf3962b249ac0ef4c4b5bac2" alt=""
Hi :) Do you think she could return to being "herself"?
ReplyDeleteCan one create "oneself" when there no "one" to begin with? When someone has been living for other purposes, for other's purposes?
Great summary btw :)
Estelle Chan I actually don't think that she can return to herself because she doesn't only losed herself, she also losed her mind because of drugs. Moreover the ending scene shows that she stayed in her illusions, she still dream of her TV Show self.
DeleteTo answer your second question i would say that the fact that she has been living for other purpose doesn't mean that she is no "one, that she has no self but just that she didn't seem to be aware of that. I don't find any situation where there is no one to begin with because we don't chose to be "one". if we could create ourself with nothing at the begining it means that we choose to exist and we don't. (tell me if my answer is not clear)
Hey
ReplyDeleteFirst let's say how amazing is this actress.
Then, about the character of Sarah : I think her biggest problem is the evolution of her subjecting truth as Kierkegaard talks about it. She had one specific relation to her surd that was overwhelmed by her son's leaving, relation that is precisely her self, that made who she is, and that was to dedicate herself to her husband and her son, like you said. Actually, she has, until then, avoided existence by hiding behind her role in her family. When her son leaves, she's a lost soul looking for marks, and she has to find a new reason to wake up every morning, like she explains it herself.
I don't think that this is about despair ; Sarah is actually a pretty optimistic woman : she keeps hoping that someday, she'd be called to go on TV. Call it madness or illusion, I call it fighting for living, and that's the most terrible in it.
Then, why is this fight being lost? Well, because Sarah's not armed enough to face reality. Indeed, her hopes are not related to something pragmatic, and this, Sarah can feel. The scene you evoked, where she keeps repeating "I'm old", reveals she's not totally cutten from reality, but that she just didn't manage to find another way to live than to convince herself that everything is still possible, even though she's old. Sarah deals really badly with her old age and her solitude. In fact, she deals badly with life. It's mostly about being strong and knowing how to face life and all what is sometimes not very pleasant in it. So I'd say that Sarah is more "weak" than desperate : to me, she doesn't realize how much her situation is hopeless. And drugs are really shown here as the refuge of those who need help for living, but obviously, this help is just another illusion.
I don't think Despair, as Kierkegaard defines it,is a matter of being optimistic or pessimistic. I think it is a matter of how you cope with yourself. the fight of Sarah to become what she wants, her hope to be called to go to TV is the reflection of her unsatisfaction of her actual self. Since she doesn't like herself she wants to become another woman thanks to the television. but to pursue a self that yout know is only and ever going to be a dream is a kind of despair. I agree that this dream keeps her alive and at the same time keeps her away from suffering and despondency. But to me despair is not about suffering and not about not being able to keep on living : it is about not being able to keep on living with your actual self.
DeletePS : She indeed is a wonderful actress. I haven't still recover from the scene when everybody is laughing at her...
DeleteHi Eva, great post !
ReplyDeleteI just would like to react on a few things.
You are talking about Sarah’s despair not being herself anymore, the self she was when she could fit in this lovely red dress. Actually, that is right, we can not divide the mind of our body. Trying to be thinner, Sarah thinks that people will love her more and that she will reach the happiness she felt during the best days of her life. But the body is not what we are. In The Metamorphosis of Kafka, when Gregor wakes up as a bug, he still thinking about how to leave the bed and how to go to work. This is not because he is a bug that he is thinking like a bug. But we are just a little mind living in a body that makes us because that is what everyone sees. Thit is when ourselves begins to belong to others.
You are saying that, at the beginning of the movie, Sarah is despaired of the lost of the one she loved and of being alone, that it is a « hidden despair ». I do not really agree with you. It seems to me that Sarah were pretty happy at first. She had a quiet life, her memories and had cool grandma friends. She did not party with them every night (why not ?) but I found in their relationship a real affection. Sarah turned mad when she began to hope that the whole country will love her through this TV show.
The truth is that in Huis Clos, Sartre have never been so right saying « The hell, it is the others ». For instance, Sarah’s son and his girlfriend Marianne should be happy together, just because they are together and love each other. But they destroy themselves being far away. In L’Etranger de Camus, the character seems to have less problems not carrying of anybody but the sun and the sound of the waves on the sand.
I can’t help thinking that we would all be happier without the others. But the fact is that we can not live without the others. That is what is absurd in our lives. Our self is not ourselves. We all are everybody’s slave. Pretty sad.
To me, drugs in this movie are just a metamorphosis of others : we can not do without them, but they destroy us.
Well … That was pretty fatalist. Did not want to take away your appetite …